The Impact of Midterm Elections on the President's Agenda and the Country's History
TLDR Midterm elections in the United States, which occur every four years, have historically had a significant impact on the president's agenda and the country's history. These elections are often seen as a referendum on the sitting president and have resulted in the party of the president losing seats in Congress in the majority of cases.
Timestamped Summary
00:00
Midterm elections in the United States are often overlooked but can have a significant impact on the president's agenda and the country's history.
01:41
Midterm elections in the United States, which occur every four years, have historically received less attention and lower voter turnout compared to presidential elections, and are often seen as a referendum on the sitting president.
03:04
In the first nine midterm elections, the party of the sitting president generally gained or maintained seats in the House and Senate, with the exception of George Washington's Federalist party in 1794 and James Madison's Democrat Republicans in 1814, but after the election of 1822, the party of the sitting president has generally lost seats in the House of Representatives in the majority of midterm elections.
04:33
In six midterm elections, the party of the sitting president did not lose seats in the House, with the first occurrence happening in 1834 and the most recent in 2002.
06:00
In the Senate, the president's party has historically been more likely to pick up seats in midterm elections, while the most lopsided midterm defeat in the House occurred in 1894 when President Grover Cleveland's Democrats lost 127 seats.
07:28
The 1874 midterm election was the worst in terms of percentage of seats lost, with the Republicans losing 93 seats in the House and 10 seats in the Senate, due to backlash against the corrupt Grant administration and the readmission of Democrat-leaning southern states.
08:58
The party of the sitting president usually loses seats in Congress during midterm elections, with this effect being more pronounced during a president's second term, and this trend has held true in 94% of all midterm elections over the last 200 years.