The Rise of Dark Money in American Politics and its Influence on Campaigns

TLDR Dark money, funded by wealthy individuals and corporations, has become a major issue in American politics, with the majority of campaign ads funded by dark money being negative and misleading. The ability to make unlimited political donations anonymously has allowed individuals and organizations to influence policies and gain favor, highlighting the inequality in the United States.

Timestamped Summary

00:00 The 1988 attack ad against Michael Dukakis, funded by the National Security Political Action Committee, is credited with turning the tide against his campaign by linking him to the Weekend Passes program that allowed a murderer named Willie Horton to commit further crimes.
04:54 Dark money refers to the funding of political campaigns by wealthy individuals and corporations, and it has been a major issue in American politics, with 60% of super PAC spending coming from just 195 people and their spouses.
10:10 The tax code allows for 501C4 organizations, which are tax-exempt nonprofits, to accept donations without revealing their donors, and in 1981, the IRS established a rule that allowed these organizations to spend up to 49% of their funds on political activities as long as 51% was spent on social welfare, leading to the rise of dark money in politics; this was further enabled by the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC in 2010.
15:23 The Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC equated speech with money, allowing corporations to make unlimited political donations as a form of protected speech under the First Amendment, while remaining anonymous through 501c4 organizations.
20:10 The Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC allows corporations to make unlimited political donations anonymously through 501c4 organizations, and this has led to the majority of campaign ads funded by dark money being negative and misleading with no accountability or fact-checking.
24:43 Both Republicans and Democrats use dark money, but the GOP significantly outspends the Democrats, with 83% of dark money being spent by Republicans and 17% by Democrats.
29:39 Even if dark money isn't necessarily nefarious, it still influences politics by creating a mentality where politicians equate the help of mega donors with their success at being elected.
34:20 The ability to purchase political campaigns allows individuals and organizations to influence policies and gain favor, highlighting the inequality in the United States.
39:17 The SEC, IRS, and FEC have all been restricted from enforcing transparency and disclosure requirements for political contributions, allowing corporations and individuals to donate unlimited amounts of money anonymously to political campaigns.
44:02 An estimated $10 billion is going to be spent on the 2016 campaign, with $5-6 billion on the presidency, and an increase from $2 billion in 2012, and the solution is strictly public financing of campaigns.
49:02 The hosts discuss a coal miner's perspective on renewable energy and job loss, and mention the potential for government spending on infrastructure to create new jobs in the renewable energy sector.
Categories: Society & Culture

Browse more Society & Culture