Sartre and Camus Debate: Sacrificing Innocents for a Utopian Future

TLDR Sartre and Camus engaged in a post-World War II debate on sacrificing innocent lives for a better future, with Sartre supporting communism despite denouncing Stalin, while Camus argued against the justification of violence for a utopian society.

Timestamped Summary

00:00 A hypothetical scenario explores the moral dilemma of sacrificing one innocent person to potentially eliminate the suffering of billions in a transformed capitalist utopia.
03:21 The debate between Sartre and Camus post-World War II Europe involved Sartre's controversial belief in allowing the killing of millions to potentially bring about a better future, influenced by the context of Stalin's rise to power and the ideological clash between capitalism and communism.
06:37 Sartre's staunch support of communism post-World War II was influenced by his fear of capitalist exploitation and the hope for a better future, despite his private denouncement of Stalin's actions.
09:55 Sartre's support for communism stemmed from his belief that it was a better choice than capitalism despite having the wrong leader, leading to a fundamental disagreement with Camus over the justifiability of killing innocent people for political ends.
13:17 Camus argues against psychological egoism and believes that caring for others is an essential human trait, contradicting Sartre's view that the ends justify the means in political decisions.
16:29 Camus criticizes Sartre's idea that sacrificing lives for a potential better future is justified, arguing that it is philosophical suicide to ignore the present reality for an uncertain utopia.
19:39 Kemu criticizes communism and Sartre's support of it, leading to a heated exchange where Sartre accuses Kemu of philosophical incompetence and abandoning existentialist principles.
22:55 Sartre misunderstood Camus' work, as Camus never identified as an existentialist, sparking a debate that still resonates today regarding the justification of violence for a better future.

Browse more Society & Culture