Ice cream market mystery: Ben and Jerry's vs Haagen Dazs
TLDR Ben and Jerry's and Haagen Dazs have different strategies in the ice cream market, sparking questions about collusion and the impact on consumers. The companies may engage in tacit collusion, mimicking each other's pricing strategies, potentially leading to higher prices and less competition.
Timestamped Summary
00:00
Two popular ice cream brands, Ben and Jerry's and Haagen Dazs, offer very different types of flavors, leading to a potential mystery of why they don't directly compete in the market.
03:24
An economist wonders why Ben and Jerry's doesn't make popular ice cream flavors like chocolate and coffee despite having the capability to do so.
07:08
Ben and Jerry's and Poggendas have different strategies when it comes to selling ice cream in supermarkets, sparking questions about potential collusion between the two companies.
10:26
Ben and Jerry's and Poggendas engage in a competitive ice cream market strategy involving crossing into each other's territory, triggering a cold war of flavors.
13:41
Ice cream companies Ben and Jerry's and Haagen-Dazs engaged in collusion, resulting in significantly higher prices for consumers.
17:06
Ice cream companies Ben and Jerry's and Haagen-Dazs may have engaged in collusion, raising questions about potential legal implications.
20:36
Tacit collusion involves competitors subtly mimicking each other's pricing strategies without explicit communication, which is not illegal but raises ethical concerns.
23:48
Consumers may be negatively impacted by tacit collusion in markets with few competitors, leading to higher prices and less competition.