Evolution of the Phillips Curve in Macroeconomics
TLDR The Phillips Curve, initially seen as a tradeoff between unemployment and inflation, faced criticism for oversimplification from economists like Milton Friedman. After the stagflation crisis of the 1970s, economists reevaluated the model to include inflation expectations, supply shocks, and the natural rate of unemployment, leading to a more complex equation.
Timestamped Summary
00:00
The assumption that massive layoffs and unemployment are necessary to control inflation comes from a historical perspective that has influenced economists and central bankers.
03:32
Bill Phillips' scientific approach to understanding the tradeoff between unemployment and inflation revolutionized macroeconomics.
06:57
Phillips discovered a clear tie between unemployment and inflation, leading to the creation of the Phillips Curve.
10:13
The Phillips Curve faced criticism from Milton Friedman for oversimplifying the relationship between unemployment and inflation, warning economists of its potential breakdown.
13:55
Economists had to reevaluate the Phillips Curve after the stagflation crisis of the 1970s, leading to a more complex equation that included inflation expectations, supply shocks, and the natural rate of unemployment.
17:40
Economist Allen Blinder successfully used the Phillips curve 2.0 to make decisions on interest rates and inflation during his time as vice chair of the Federal Reserve in 1994, aiming for a soft landing to control inflation without causing a recession.
21:05
Economist Allen Blinder stopped believing in the Phillips curve after experiencing a period of stable inflation despite significant economic fluctuations, highlighting the challenges of relying on economic models for predicting inflation.